Most messengers encrypt your messages. But they still see who you talk to, how often, when, and for how long. That’s not privacy — it’s metadata surveillance with a prettier face.
Unlink makes metadata unusable — by design.
You apply for a loan. Or a visa. Or insurance. No one reviews it — an algorithm scores your risk.
It doesn’t read your messages. It just sees the patterns: late-night activity, flagged contacts, short exchanges.
You’ve broken no law. But your score drops — and you’re quietly denied.
This isn’t science fiction. It’s already part of how decisions are made — in finance, immigration, and public services.
You don’t need to be guilty to be treated like a risk.
Is this how you expect to be treated — just for sending a message?
You shouldn’t need blind trust to send a message. You shouldn’t have to wonder who’s watching, scoring, or profiling your connections.
Unlink doesn’t just encrypt what you say — it erases what surveillance feeds on. Contact lists never leave your device, and nothing linkable is exposed to the network.
Every message moves through a decentralized network. All traffic looks the same. Identities stay unlinkable — and no one can deny you access.
With Unlink, privacy happens behind the scenes — so seamlessly, you won’t even notice.
Unlike donation-dependent messengers, Unlink sustains itself through the protocol.
A small fee built into each message funds the network — no need for ads, no tracking, no monetization of user behavior.
Half of all users fund the other half through a faucet system, making access universal while keeping abuse out.
Privacy doesn't need a business model — when the protocol funds itself.
Not just encrypted — but unlinkable. Not dependent on trust — but built to make trust unnecessary.
Encryption hides what you say. Metadata shows everything else. Try the messenger that has nothing to leak — by design.
Unlink Messenger isn’t just private by design — it’s reviewed by independent experts, researchers, and open-source contributors around the world.
From security audits to hackathons, its core has been tested — and keeps evolving in the open.
Privacy isn't a feature. It's a standard. And it doesn't depend on trust — only math, review, and transparency.
